https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424367 The appellate court upheld the trial court's judgment, confirming the acquittal of the respondent. The complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt, and the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the high threshold for interfering with acquittals and found no grounds to overturn the trial court's decision. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424367 The appellate court upheld the trial court's judgment, confirming the acquittal of the respondent. The complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt, and the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the high threshold for interfering with acquittals and found no grounds to overturn the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424367