https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302999 The Tribunal rectified an error in the Final Order by acknowledging that only M/s.Innobiz Electronics Pvt. Ltd. had filed an appeal, not the Managing Director, as erroneously stated. The Department sought correction of this mistake under the Customs Act, 1962. The Bench ordered the modification of the Final Order to reflect the accurate parties involved in the appeal process, emphasizing the importance of precision in legal documentation and ensuring clarity in judicial proceedings. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302999 The Tribunal rectified an error in the Final Order by acknowledging that only M/s.Innobiz Electronics Pvt. Ltd. had filed an appeal, not the Managing Director, as erroneously stated. The Department sought correction of this mistake under the Customs Act, 1962. The Bench ordered the modification of the Final Order to reflect the accurate parties involved in the appeal process, emphasizing the importance of precision in legal documentation and ensuring clarity in judicial proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302999