https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303007 The High Court upheld the trial court's judgment acquitting all respondents of charges under Sections 302, 120-B, 380, and 411 of the IPC. The prosecution's case relying on circumstantial evidence, the "last seen theory," and the credibility of the star witness (PW-3) was found insufficient and unreliable. Discrepancies in evidence recovery raised doubts about the prosecution's case. The High Court concluded that the evidence presented was inconsistent and failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the dismissal of the leave petition and affirming the trial court's acquittal decision. en-us Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303007 The High Court upheld the trial court's judgment acquitting all respondents of charges under Sections 302, 120-B, 380, and 411 of the IPC. The prosecution's case relying on circumstantial evidence, the "last seen theory," and the credibility of the star witness (PW-3) was found insufficient and unreliable. Discrepancies in evidence recovery raised doubts about the prosecution's case. The High Court concluded that the evidence presented was inconsistent and failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the dismissal of the leave petition and affirming the trial court's acquittal decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303007