<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2063 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303006</link>
    <description>The Court held that TDS deduction on compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act was not justified. It emphasized the precedence of Social Welfare Legislation over Taxation Legislation in such cases. The first respondent was directed to recover and deposit the TDS amount, ensuring the full compensation was paid to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2063 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303006</link>
      <description>The Court held that TDS deduction on compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act was not justified. It emphasized the precedence of Social Welfare Legislation over Taxation Legislation in such cases. The first respondent was directed to recover and deposit the TDS amount, ensuring the full compensation was paid to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>