https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303003 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, holding that an industry manufacturing Rusks falls under the relevant entry in Schedule I of the Employees Provident Funds & etc. Act, 1952. The court determined that since Rusks can be considered either as biscuits or bread, both of which are covered under the specific entry, any industry manufacturing Rusks is subject to the Act's provisions. en-us Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303003 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, holding that an industry manufacturing Rusks falls under the relevant entry in Schedule I of the Employees Provident Funds & etc. Act, 1952. The court determined that since Rusks can be considered either as biscuits or bread, both of which are covered under the specific entry, any industry manufacturing Rusks is subject to the Act's provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303003