<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29341</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the charitable trust, finding that the surplus contributions received were voluntary and exempt under section 12(1) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the contributions were intended to be held as an accretion to the trust&#039;s corpus, primarily for charitable purposes. It was determined that the contributions were of a voluntary nature, qualifying for the exemption under section 12(1), regardless of whether they constituted income or corpus of the trust. The court did not address questions 1 and 2, deeming them unnecessary due to the decision on question 3, and answered question 4 in the negative. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:44:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29341</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the charitable trust, finding that the surplus contributions received were voluntary and exempt under section 12(1) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the contributions were intended to be held as an accretion to the trust&#039;s corpus, primarily for charitable purposes. It was determined that the contributions were of a voluntary nature, qualifying for the exemption under section 12(1), regardless of whether they constituted income or corpus of the trust. The court did not address questions 1 and 2, deeming them unnecessary due to the decision on question 3, and answered question 4 in the negative. No costs were awarded in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>