<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302994</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, agreeing that the Insurance Company was justified in deducting T.D.S. from the interest component of the award amount. The court quashed the order directing T.D.S. deposit, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302994</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, agreeing that the Insurance Company was justified in deducting T.D.S. from the interest component of the award amount. The court quashed the order directing T.D.S. deposit, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>