<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29339</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the department, ruling that Section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act was rightly invoked due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose the relationship between herself and the minor partners. The court found this omission constituted a valid ground for reassessment, distinguishing the case from past decisions where such disclosure was not required. The assessee was ordered to pay costs, including counsel fees of Rs. 350.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 37 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29339</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the department, ruling that Section 147(a) of the Income Tax Act was rightly invoked due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose the relationship between herself and the minor partners. The court found this omission constituted a valid ground for reassessment, distinguishing the case from past decisions where such disclosure was not required. The assessee was ordered to pay costs, including counsel fees of Rs. 350.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>