<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1793 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302991</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the plaintiff&#039;s suit under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, as it was based on a &#039;Benami Transaction&#039; prohibited by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The Court held that the Act applies to claims filed after its enactment, regardless of when the transaction occurred. Since the suit was filed post the Act&#039;s introduction and referenced a &#039;Benami Transaction&#039; for ownership, the claim was legally barred, leading to the dismissal of the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1793 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302991</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the plaintiff&#039;s suit under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, as it was based on a &#039;Benami Transaction&#039; prohibited by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The Court held that the Act applies to claims filed after its enactment, regardless of when the transaction occurred. Since the suit was filed post the Act&#039;s introduction and referenced a &#039;Benami Transaction&#039; for ownership, the claim was legally barred, leading to the dismissal of the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>