https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424362 The AAR, Maharashtra declined to rule on GST classification for engine overhaul and repair services. The applicant sought determination on whether supplies constituted composite supply and applicable tax rates for only 2 out of 4 supply types under a single tender. The Authority held that artificially dividing a single tender into parts while ignoring other components would be inappropriate. Since the tender comprised different activities under one document that could not be considered as naturally bundled composite supply, the Authority refused to answer questions regarding major overhaul and repair of sub-assemblies. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424362 The AAR, Maharashtra declined to rule on GST classification for engine overhaul and repair services. The applicant sought determination on whether supplies constituted composite supply and applicable tax rates for only 2 out of 4 supply types under a single tender. The Authority held that artificially dividing a single tender into parts while ignoring other components would be inappropriate. Since the tender comprised different activities under one document that could not be considered as naturally bundled composite supply, the Authority refused to answer questions regarding major overhaul and repair of sub-assemblies. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424362