<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29338</link>
    <description>For capital loss computation on share sales, the original cost of acquisition remains the assessee&#039;s actual cost, subject only to the statutory adjustment in section 55(2), and a later bonus issue does not reduce that cost; the point was answered for the assessee. A lease of house properties to a partnership firm composed of close relatives was treated as collusive and not genuine on the surrounding facts; the finding was upheld against the assessee. For house property income, annual value must be determined by the rent reasonably expected to be received under sections 22 and 23, not by a sham or understated rent arrangement; this issue was decided for the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29338</link>
      <description>For capital loss computation on share sales, the original cost of acquisition remains the assessee&#039;s actual cost, subject only to the statutory adjustment in section 55(2), and a later bonus issue does not reduce that cost; the point was answered for the assessee. A lease of house properties to a partnership firm composed of close relatives was treated as collusive and not genuine on the surrounding facts; the finding was upheld against the assessee. For house property income, annual value must be determined by the rent reasonably expected to be received under sections 22 and 23, not by a sham or understated rent arrangement; this issue was decided for the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>