<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 34 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29337</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the cost of bonus shares should be determined by spreading the cost of the original shares over both the original and bonus shares, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 34 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29337</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the cost of bonus shares should be determined by spreading the cost of the original shares over both the original and bonus shares, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>