<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1179 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424338</link>
    <description>The Member allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to cenvat credit on GTA services. The decision was based on the appellant bearing the freight cost without separately charging customers, aligning with legal precedents and the inclusion of freight in the invoice value for excise duty purposes. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s legal right to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:43:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1179 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424338</link>
      <description>The Member allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to cenvat credit on GTA services. The decision was based on the appellant bearing the freight cost without separately charging customers, aligning with legal precedents and the inclusion of freight in the invoice value for excise duty purposes. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s legal right to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>