https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424333 Writ petitions challenging a revisional order under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the revisional order. The Court noted that the petitioners had already been heard by the revisional authority and that Section 33 provided an appellate remedy against an order passed in revision. As the alternative remedy was adequate, writ jurisdiction was not exercised, and the parties were left free to raise their grounds before the appellate authority. The writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424333 Writ petitions challenging a revisional order under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the revisional order. The Court noted that the petitioners had already been heard by the revisional authority and that Section 33 provided an appellate remedy against an order passed in revision. As the alternative remedy was adequate, writ jurisdiction was not exercised, and the parties were left free to raise their grounds before the appellate authority. The writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424333