<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1173 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424332</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the judgments of the Trial Court and the Sessions Judge&#039;s Court. The accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act due to the substantial material alteration in the cheque rendering it void. The court emphasized the importance of recognizing such alterations and invalidated the basis for the conviction, ordering the case records to be transmitted back to the respective courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1173 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424332</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the judgments of the Trial Court and the Sessions Judge&#039;s Court. The accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act due to the substantial material alteration in the cheque rendering it void. The court emphasized the importance of recognizing such alterations and invalidated the basis for the conviction, ordering the case records to be transmitted back to the respective courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>