<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</link>
    <description>Recognition and enforcement of a foreign award may be sought in the High Court that has territorial nexus through the judgment debtor or its assets for the subject matter of the award. Parallel proceedings in another forum did not bar a separate enforcement petition under Part II, and the non-joinder of the company was not fatal where enforcement was sought only against the relevant award debtor. Refusal under Section 48 is confined to exhaustive statutory grounds, and the public policy defence must be narrowly construed. Selective enforcement of part of an award was not contrary to public policy merely because other parts were pursued elsewhere. The award was recognised and declared enforceable as a decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</link>
      <description>Recognition and enforcement of a foreign award may be sought in the High Court that has territorial nexus through the judgment debtor or its assets for the subject matter of the award. Parallel proceedings in another forum did not bar a separate enforcement petition under Part II, and the non-joinder of the company was not fatal where enforcement was sought only against the relevant award debtor. Refusal under Section 48 is confined to exhaustive statutory grounds, and the public policy defence must be narrowly construed. Selective enforcement of part of an award was not contrary to public policy merely because other parts were pursued elsewhere. The award was recognised and declared enforceable as a decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>