<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</link>
    <description>The court held jurisdiction over the matter, recognized and enforced the Foreign Award, determined the non-joinder of a company as a necessary party, found pending proceedings did not preclude the present case, and concluded that enforcing the Foreign Award did not violate public policy. The court allowed the petitions, declaring the Foreign Award as enforceable, granting the respective petitioner the right to enforce it as a decree of the court, without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</link>
      <description>The court held jurisdiction over the matter, recognized and enforced the Foreign Award, determined the non-joinder of a company as a necessary party, found pending proceedings did not preclude the present case, and concluded that enforcing the Foreign Award did not violate public policy. The court allowed the petitions, declaring the Foreign Award as enforceable, granting the respective petitioner the right to enforce it as a decree of the court, without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>