https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302987 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision, reinstated the Single Judge's interim injunction, and ordered a detailed trial. Emphasizing the importance of expert evidence in complex patent disputes, the Court criticized the summary adjudication without such testimony. The case involved disputes over patent validity, infringement claims, applicability of Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, and the relationship with the PPVFR Act. The Court highlighted the need for a thorough examination of these issues with expert testimony and urged cooperation for a swift resolution. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302987 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision, reinstated the Single Judge's interim injunction, and ordered a detailed trial. Emphasizing the importance of expert evidence in complex patent disputes, the Court criticized the summary adjudication without such testimony. The case involved disputes over patent validity, infringement claims, applicability of Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, and the relationship with the PPVFR Act. The Court highlighted the need for a thorough examination of these issues with expert testimony and urged cooperation for a swift resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302987