<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1423 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302986</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing their lawyer to be present during interrogation by customs officials under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. The lawyer is permitted to sit at a visible distance but beyond audibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1423 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302986</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing their lawyer to be present during interrogation by customs officials under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. The lawyer is permitted to sit at a visible distance but beyond audibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>