<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1599 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302984</link>
    <description>The court modified the previous judgment, allowing the respondent to clear existing stock until 30th April 2020 and issuing an injunction from 1st May 2020 to restrain the respondent from using the mark &#039;Shyam&#039; until the suit&#039;s resolution. The court emphasized compliance with the Trademarks Act, expedited the suit, and directed the respondent to maintain accounts as per the original order, with potential modifications by the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1599 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302984</link>
      <description>The court modified the previous judgment, allowing the respondent to clear existing stock until 30th April 2020 and issuing an injunction from 1st May 2020 to restrain the respondent from using the mark &#039;Shyam&#039; until the suit&#039;s resolution. The court emphasized compliance with the Trademarks Act, expedited the suit, and directed the respondent to maintain accounts as per the original order, with potential modifications by the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>