<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1256 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302988</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court directed respondents to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, followed by the petitioner filing a reply within two weeks. The matter is scheduled for final hearing after seven weeks, with parties instructed to prepare short written notes of arguments. The issue of maintainability of the writ petition remains undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1256 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302988</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court directed respondents to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, followed by the petitioner filing a reply within two weeks. The matter is scheduled for final hearing after seven weeks, with parties instructed to prepare short written notes of arguments. The issue of maintainability of the writ petition remains undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>