<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1654 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302977</link>
    <description>Whether statutory notice under the Negotiable Instruments Act was duly served, and whether the cheque return memo remark justified quashing, were held to be triable issues requiring evidence. The High Court, therefore, should not have quashed the complaint and criminal proceedings at the threshold under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, because both objections depended on factual adjudication rather than an indisputable record. The quashing orders were set aside and the complaints were directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1654 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302977</link>
      <description>Whether statutory notice under the Negotiable Instruments Act was duly served, and whether the cheque return memo remark justified quashing, were held to be triable issues requiring evidence. The High Court, therefore, should not have quashed the complaint and criminal proceedings at the threshold under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, because both objections depended on factual adjudication rather than an indisputable record. The quashing orders were set aside and the complaints were directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>