https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302975 Payment of the disputed central excise duty with interest removed the basis for continuing proceedings under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, so those proceedings were held unsustainable. The violation of payment discipline nevertheless justified a limited penalty under Rule 27, and the larger penalties were set aside. A penalty of Rs. 5,000 on the main appellant was upheld. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:50:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302975 Payment of the disputed central excise duty with interest removed the basis for continuing proceedings under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, so those proceedings were held unsustainable. The violation of payment discipline nevertheless justified a limited penalty under Rule 27, and the larger penalties were set aside. A penalty of Rs. 5,000 on the main appellant was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302975