https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302972 The court rejected the petitioners' challenge to the maintainability of the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the complaint sufficiently established a prima facie case against the accused, emphasizing the need for detailed allegations and evidence to establish criminal liability. The court upheld the trial proceedings, highlighting the importance of direct connection between the accused's role in the business and the alleged offense, as established in relevant precedents. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302972 The court rejected the petitioners' challenge to the maintainability of the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It held that the complaint sufficiently established a prima facie case against the accused, emphasizing the need for detailed allegations and evidence to establish criminal liability. The court upheld the trial proceedings, highlighting the importance of direct connection between the accused's role in the business and the alleged offense, as established in relevant precedents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302972