<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1142 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424301</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the limitation period for claiming refund of Special Additional Duty under the Customs Act should not be enforced, citing previous decisions that such limitations cannot be imposed under Section 27 or related Notifications. The Court found in favor of the appellant, stating that the conditions for availing exemption under the Act should not include a limitation on claiming refunds. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1142 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424301</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the limitation period for claiming refund of Special Additional Duty under the Customs Act should not be enforced, citing previous decisions that such limitations cannot be imposed under Section 27 or related Notifications. The Court found in favor of the appellant, stating that the conditions for availing exemption under the Act should not include a limitation on claiming refunds. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>