<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302969</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that adjustments made by Revenue via intimation under s.143(1) on a debatable and controversial issue (delay in depositing employees&#039; contributions to ESI/PF) were beyond the scope of s.143(1). The tribunal found retrospective amendment inapplicable to sustain such additions by intimation and that the lower authority erred in confirming the addition. Decision rendered in favour of the assessee, setting aside the s.143(1) adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302969</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that adjustments made by Revenue via intimation under s.143(1) on a debatable and controversial issue (delay in depositing employees&#039; contributions to ESI/PF) were beyond the scope of s.143(1). The tribunal found retrospective amendment inapplicable to sustain such additions by intimation and that the lower authority erred in confirming the addition. Decision rendered in favour of the assessee, setting aside the s.143(1) adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>