https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302970 The Court acknowledged the complexity of the case and allowed the writ petition challenging the order for violation of natural justice principles by not permitting cross-examination of witnesses. The respondents were directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition, and the petitioner was granted the chance to respond. The matter was scheduled for a final hearing, with a stay on coercive actions based on the impugned order until a specified date or further orders. Both parties were instructed to prepare written arguments and compilations for the upcoming hearing. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Jun 2022 21:59:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302970 The Court acknowledged the complexity of the case and allowed the writ petition challenging the order for violation of natural justice principles by not permitting cross-examination of witnesses. The respondents were directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition, and the petitioner was granted the chance to respond. The matter was scheduled for a final hearing, with a stay on coercive actions based on the impugned order until a specified date or further orders. Both parties were instructed to prepare written arguments and compilations for the upcoming hearing. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302970