<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302971</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227, emphasizing the need to exhaust the alternative remedy provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The court reiterated that when an effective statutory remedy is available, the High Court should refrain from exercising its jurisdiction under Articles 226/227. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed as a result of this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2022 21:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302971</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227, emphasizing the need to exhaust the alternative remedy provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The court reiterated that when an effective statutory remedy is available, the High Court should refrain from exercising its jurisdiction under Articles 226/227. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed as a result of this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>