<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29322</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 52,966 in computing income for the relevant year. The court determined that the payment was a revenue expense necessary for the assessee to earn profits from the acquired business, emphasizing the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure. The decision highlighted the importance of analyzing the true nature and purpose of payments for income tax deductibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:53:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 34 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29322</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 52,966 in computing income for the relevant year. The court determined that the payment was a revenue expense necessary for the assessee to earn profits from the acquired business, emphasizing the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure. The decision highlighted the importance of analyzing the true nature and purpose of payments for income tax deductibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>