<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 217 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956</link>
    <description>The Chief Presidency Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to issue the warrant for arrest outside India. The procedure followed was unauthorized by law, and the requisition by the Central Government was deemed illegal. The actions of the authorities were criticized for undermining India&#039;s sovereignty and laws. The ruling quashed the warrant of arrest and subsequent proceedings, declaring them invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 10:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 217 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956</link>
      <description>The Chief Presidency Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to issue the warrant for arrest outside India. The procedure followed was unauthorized by law, and the requisition by the Central Government was deemed illegal. The actions of the authorities were criticized for undermining India&#039;s sovereignty and laws. The ruling quashed the warrant of arrest and subsequent proceedings, declaring them invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>