https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956 A warrant of arrest under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 could not be routed through State and Central executive authorities for execution abroad to secure extradition, because the Code operated within India and conferred no extraterritorial warrant power. A Government of India circular could not validate that procedure, as it had no statutory force and could not override the Code or the Extradition Act, 1962. The Extradition Act, 1962 was treated as a complete code, but it did not authorise the requisition for surrender from Hong Kong on the facts shown. The warrant and all consequential proceedings were therefore quashed. en-us Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2022 10:46:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956 A warrant of arrest under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 could not be routed through State and Central executive authorities for execution abroad to secure extradition, because the Code operated within India and conferred no extraterritorial warrant power. A Government of India circular could not validate that procedure, as it had no statutory force and could not override the Code or the Extradition Act, 1962. The Extradition Act, 1962 was treated as a complete code, but it did not authorise the requisition for surrender from Hong Kong on the facts shown. The warrant and all consequential proceedings were therefore quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302956