https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424287 The court found the demand for service tax for the period 2012-13 and 2013-14 on companies engaged in Chitty business to be unsustainable in law. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration in line with legal principles. Documents Ext.P1 to Ext.P22 were set aside, and authorities were directed to reexamine the issue following the Margadarshi Chit Fund case decision. The petitioners were granted relief sought, and any refund applications were to be promptly evaluated based on the legal principles outlined in the case. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2022 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424287 The court found the demand for service tax for the period 2012-13 and 2013-14 on companies engaged in Chitty business to be unsustainable in law. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration in line with legal principles. Documents Ext.P1 to Ext.P22 were set aside, and authorities were directed to reexamine the issue following the Margadarshi Chit Fund case decision. The petitioners were granted relief sought, and any refund applications were to be promptly evaluated based on the legal principles outlined in the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424287