<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424284</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The appellate authorities found no evidence to support taxing the MILIEV grant transferred to another company, denied the offset credit addition due to lack of proof, and allowed electricity charges deduction paid to Wescare as legitimate business expenses. The court concluded that the transactions were genuine, with no violation of public policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1125 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424284</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The appellate authorities found no evidence to support taxing the MILIEV grant transferred to another company, denied the offset credit addition due to lack of proof, and allowed electricity charges deduction paid to Wescare as legitimate business expenses. The court concluded that the transactions were genuine, with no violation of public policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>