<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1089 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order classifying imported goods under CTH 8708 and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of goods under CTH 7318 and CTH 9032 were considered, emphasizing the need for proper examination of legal aspects for correct classification. The appeal was allowed for further classification determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1089 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order classifying imported goods under CTH 8708 and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of goods under CTH 7318 and CTH 9032 were considered, emphasizing the need for proper examination of legal aspects for correct classification. The appeal was allowed for further classification determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>