<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s grievances regarding the deduction under section 80IA, provision for pit covering expenses, and post-closure expenses. It directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate on the computation of accumulated profits and upheld the deletion of penalties and adjustments made by the revenue authorities. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were in line with established legal principles and judicial precedents, providing relief to the assessee on various contentious issues raised during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s grievances regarding the deduction under section 80IA, provision for pit covering expenses, and post-closure expenses. It directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate on the computation of accumulated profits and upheld the deletion of penalties and adjustments made by the revenue authorities. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were in line with established legal principles and judicial precedents, providing relief to the assessee on various contentious issues raised during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>