<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302940</link>
    <description>Section 429 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 contemplates reference of the entire appeal to a third Judge when appellate Judges are equally divided, and the third Judge may hear the matter as he considers fit and decide the whole case. On the merits, common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was found where the assault was pre-arranged, concerted, and executed in furtherance of a shared design. A mistake as to the victim&#039;s identity did not defeat shared liability because the accused acted together and one participant restrained a companion who might have intervened. The conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302940</link>
      <description>Section 429 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 contemplates reference of the entire appeal to a third Judge when appellate Judges are equally divided, and the third Judge may hear the matter as he considers fit and decide the whole case. On the merits, common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was found where the assault was pre-arranged, concerted, and executed in furtherance of a shared design. A mistake as to the victim&#039;s identity did not defeat shared liability because the accused acted together and one participant restrained a companion who might have intervened. The conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>