https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302939 The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences from the lower courts, dismissing the appeal. It emphasized the need for careful discretion in granting certificates for appeal under Article 134(1)(c), requiring substantial questions of law or principle. The death penalty was maintained due to the severity of the offense, rejecting arguments for life imprisonment based on the time passed. The Court highlighted the importance of deciding each case on its own merits and upheld the death penalty despite differing opinions among High Court judges. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302939 The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences from the lower courts, dismissing the appeal. It emphasized the need for careful discretion in granting certificates for appeal under Article 134(1)(c), requiring substantial questions of law or principle. The death penalty was maintained due to the severity of the offense, rejecting arguments for life imprisonment based on the time passed. The Court highlighted the importance of deciding each case on its own merits and upheld the death penalty despite differing opinions among High Court judges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302939