<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302938</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal on the grounds of res judicata. The seniority list issued on December 28, 1992, and finalized on October 29, 1993, was upheld, with the principle of pushing down promotions in excess of the quota. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the seniority list as of December 31, 1987, remained valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302938</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal on the grounds of res judicata. The seniority list issued on December 28, 1992, and finalized on October 29, 1993, was upheld, with the principle of pushing down promotions in excess of the quota. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the seniority list as of December 31, 1987, remained valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>