<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 656 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302937</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeals and affirming the conviction and sentences. The court found no infirmity in the lower courts&#039; conclusions, supporting the credibility of witnesses, application of Section 34 IPC, and the alleged delay in recording the FIR. The detailed analysis conducted by the court led to the affirmation of the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 656 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302937</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeals and affirming the conviction and sentences. The court found no infirmity in the lower courts&#039; conclusions, supporting the credibility of witnesses, application of Section 34 IPC, and the alleged delay in recording the FIR. The detailed analysis conducted by the court led to the affirmation of the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>