<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424240</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned assessment order dated 18.02.2021 and remitted the case back to the respondent for a proper order within three months. The impugned order was considered a show cause notice, and the petitioner was granted thirty days to respond. Proceedings were to be conducted via video conferencing, ensuring adherence to procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424240</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned assessment order dated 18.02.2021 and remitted the case back to the respondent for a proper order within three months. The impugned order was considered a show cause notice, and the petitioner was granted thirty days to respond. Proceedings were to be conducted via video conferencing, ensuring adherence to procedural requirements and principles of natural justice. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>