<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29309</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow half of the claimed amount as a deduction from the assessee&#039;s share income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that possibly the entire amount could have been allowed as a deduction. The court distinguished the case from precedents and emphasized that expenses incurred by a partner in managing interests in a firm could be considered allowable deductions against the partner&#039;s share from a partnership business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29309</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow half of the claimed amount as a deduction from the assessee&#039;s share income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that possibly the entire amount could have been allowed as a deduction. The court distinguished the case from precedents and emphasized that expenses incurred by a partner in managing interests in a firm could be considered allowable deductions against the partner&#039;s share from a partnership business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>