<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1065 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, ruling that the activities were charitable, making them eligible for exemptions under sections 11 &amp;amp; 12. The Government grants were deemed corpus funds for specific projects, not taxable income. Capital expenditure was allowed as an application of income, following Supreme Court precedent. The AO was directed to allow depreciation deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1065 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, ruling that the activities were charitable, making them eligible for exemptions under sections 11 &amp;amp; 12. The Government grants were deemed corpus funds for specific projects, not taxable income. Capital expenditure was allowed as an application of income, following Supreme Court precedent. The AO was directed to allow depreciation deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>