<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under section 148 were impermissible as they were based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The assessment order was declared without jurisdiction, and the disallowance of Rs. 3,03,42,451 in respect of Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) expenditure was not addressed on merits. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under section 148 were impermissible as they were based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The assessment order was declared without jurisdiction, and the disallowance of Rs. 3,03,42,451 in respect of Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) expenditure was not addressed on merits. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>