<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1054 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice was misconceived as the transactions predated the introduction of the Exclusion Clause. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal and setting aside of the order-in-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:18:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1054 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice was misconceived as the transactions predated the introduction of the Exclusion Clause. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal and setting aside of the order-in-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>