<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1052 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow late payment of Provident Fund (PF) contributions under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2019-20. The Tribunal emphasized that no disallowance should occur when the issue is debatable, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the application of the amended provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1052 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow late payment of Provident Fund (PF) contributions under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2019-20. The Tribunal emphasized that no disallowance should occur when the issue is debatable, ultimately allowing the appeal and rejecting the application of the amended provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>