https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a compounding fee imposed in addition to a one-time tax payment. The Court emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy under Section 54 of the Act to contest the fee, directing the petitioner to exhaust this remedy before seeking judicial intervention. The judgment highlighted the importance of utilizing alternative remedies before resorting to extraordinary judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court disposed of the petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to address the compounding fee issue through the statutory revision process. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:00:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a compounding fee imposed in addition to a one-time tax payment. The Court emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy under Section 54 of the Act to contest the fee, directing the petitioner to exhaust this remedy before seeking judicial intervention. The judgment highlighted the importance of utilizing alternative remedies before resorting to extraordinary judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court disposed of the petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to address the compounding fee issue through the statutory revision process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197