https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197 The writ challenge to a compounding fee levy was declined because the statute provided an efficacious revisional remedy, and the dispute depended on factual adjudication by the prescribed fact-finding forum. With tax already paid and no demonstrated breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or patent statutory violation, the HC held that extraordinary writ jurisdiction was inappropriate. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory revision remedy, and the impugned order was not examined on merits. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:00:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197 The writ challenge to a compounding fee levy was declined because the statute provided an efficacious revisional remedy, and the dispute depended on factual adjudication by the prescribed fact-finding forum. With tax already paid and no demonstrated breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or patent statutory violation, the HC held that extraordinary writ jurisdiction was inappropriate. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory revision remedy, and the impugned order was not examined on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424197