https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424195 Reliable prosecution evidence that withstands cross-examination justified interference with neither the conviction under the Abkari Act nor the findings on guilt, so the conviction was sustained. However, sentencing was moderated because of the long lapse of time since the incident, the appellant's age, and the absence of criminal antecedents, which were treated as mitigating factors. The custodial sentence was reduced to simple imprisonment for one year under Section 55(g), while the fine was maintained and the default sentence was altered accordingly. en-us Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:58:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424195 Reliable prosecution evidence that withstands cross-examination justified interference with neither the conviction under the Abkari Act nor the findings on guilt, so the conviction was sustained. However, sentencing was moderated because of the long lapse of time since the incident, the appellant's age, and the absence of criminal antecedents, which were treated as mitigating factors. The custodial sentence was reduced to simple imprisonment for one year under Section 55(g), while the fine was maintained and the default sentence was altered accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424195