https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424189 The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 57,01,479/- with future interest, based on promissory notes, as the defendant successfully argued material alteration of the notes from 2001 to 2007. Expert testimony confirmed the alteration, leading the court to apply Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rendering the notes void. The court held that any alteration in the date of a promissory note is material and void unless consented to by the affected party, ultimately dismissing the plaintiff's appeal and closing pending petitions. en-us Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424189 The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 57,01,479/- with future interest, based on promissory notes, as the defendant successfully argued material alteration of the notes from 2001 to 2007. Expert testimony confirmed the alteration, leading the court to apply Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, rendering the notes void. The court held that any alteration in the date of a promissory note is material and void unless consented to by the affected party, ultimately dismissing the plaintiff's appeal and closing pending petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424189