<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1519 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302930</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the release of the subject goods upon payment of the one-time tax. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the tax imposition and compounding fee as per the impugned notice. The judgment also indicated the closure of connected pending applications without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1519 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302930</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the release of the subject goods upon payment of the one-time tax. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the tax imposition and compounding fee as per the impugned notice. The judgment also indicated the closure of connected pending applications without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>