<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1649 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302934</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Regulation 45-B and the Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) determined by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission. The appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, and they were directed to make necessary deposits with interest and other charges within one month, permitting coercive recovery measures by the respondents if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 07:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1649 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302934</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Regulation 45-B and the Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) determined by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission. The appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, and they were directed to make necessary deposits with interest and other charges within one month, permitting coercive recovery measures by the respondents if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>