https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921 A valid partnership registration under the Indian Partnership Act continues unless cancelled according to law, and territorial change in the registering office does not by itself invalidate it, so the suit was not barred under section 69(2). Forward contracts in cotton seeds were not prohibited because the continuance provision in section 5 of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act preserved only prior orders relating to essential commodities, and cotton seeds did not fall within that class. The decree was also correctly enhanced after the accounts were adjusted for the true debit and credit entries, and the modified decree was affirmed. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:19:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921 A valid partnership registration under the Indian Partnership Act continues unless cancelled according to law, and territorial change in the registering office does not by itself invalidate it, so the suit was not barred under section 69(2). Forward contracts in cotton seeds were not prohibited because the continuance provision in section 5 of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act preserved only prior orders relating to essential commodities, and cotton seeds did not fall within that class. The decree was also correctly enhanced after the accounts were adjusted for the true debit and credit entries, and the modified decree was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921