<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the validity of the plaintiff firm&#039;s registration under the Indian Partnership Act. The Court also ruled that the transactions were not prohibited forward contracts and upheld the calculation of debits and credits based on actual purchase and sale rates. The appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and affirming the validity of the plaintiff firm&#039;s registration under the Indian Partnership Act. The Court also ruled that the transactions were not prohibited forward contracts and upheld the calculation of debits and credits based on actual purchase and sale rates. The appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>