<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 994 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302918</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of the first appellate court and itself, restoring the trial court&#039;s decision on the ownership of joint ancestral property and the validity of marriage between defendant No. 1 and Radhika Singh. The court emphasized the importance of evidence and legal principles in reaching its decision. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:56:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 994 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302918</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of the first appellate court and itself, restoring the trial court&#039;s decision on the ownership of joint ancestral property and the validity of marriage between defendant No. 1 and Radhika Singh. The court emphasized the importance of evidence and legal principles in reaching its decision. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>